- Odds Of Losing 8 Straight Blackjack Hands
- Odds Of Blackjack Hands
- Odds Of Losing Blackjack Hands In A Row
- Odds Of Losing 4 Blackjack Hands In A Row
- Odds Of Winning Blackjack Hands

- Single deck blackjack has the lowest casino edge of 0.16%, which gives the player better odds. Double deck games have a considerably low edge at 0.46%. Most land-based resorts and reputable online casinos use six to eight decks for blackjack.
- What is the probability of losing the next six hands at blackjack, using basic strategy? Since each hand has a 48.0% chance of being a loss, the answer is 0.48 ^ 6 = 0.012 = 1.2%. But wait a minute That still wasn’t the right question!
- But I'm not quite sure how to calculate the math behind this and how to calculate the probability for winning a single blackjack hand. I figured with 10,000 credits, I can start my bet at 1, then go to 2, then 4, etc (doubling my bet everytime I lose). This allows me to lose up to 12 hands before I am bankrupt.

Blackjack Tips - Understanding House Edge, Blackjack Odds and How to Win. In Example 2, the probability of the dealer getting a hand between 18 and 21 on their next card is 40.81%.

## By *Hon.* Ion Saliu, *Founder of Blackjack Justice*

First capture by the *WayBack Machine* (*web.archive.org*) May 21, 2020.

**Your Honor, I hereby accuse the**

Our complaint shall prove that the real conditions of the game are far worse than the

*Order of Casino Sycophants*of damaging public deception. They make-believe that the glamorous game of blackjack has a frivolous*house edge*. Said game with its odds is so attractive to the masses that we can treat it equally to tossing a golden coin.Our complaint shall prove that the real conditions of the game are far worse than the

*fake-news*promoted, indeed imposed, by the*Order of Casinos*and their*Sycophants*.Let me just say that benign ignorance has been at the heart of the matter. Nobody really knew what the real *odds* (*probability*) of blackjack were. Analysts lacked the fundamental elements required by the fundamental formula of *probability*: *favorable cases* (over) *total possible cases*.

Calculating the odds is the *sine qua non* condition of calculating the *house advantage* or the *edge* the casinos have in the game of blackjack. No casino offers a game where they don't have an edge or advantage. It's their bloodline — a legal requirement, as a matter of fact.

The first attempt at calculating the house advantage in blackjack is granted to John Scarne, a non-mathematical man who had the ambition of being the greatest gambling writer in history. Personally, I grant such honor to Blaise Pascal who analyzed a backgammon game. The historical event is known as *de Méré Case* and it founded a branch of mathematics hence known as *theory of probability*.

John Scarne rightly figured out that the casino gains an edge in blackjack because of the *simultaneous bust* — the dealer and the player bust at the same time. However, when the player busts, he/she loses the bet immediately as he/she always plays first. It is possible that the dealer can bust his/her hand (in the same round), but it is too late for the player; they already lost their bet.

John Scarne calculated the odds of dealer's bust to be **28%**. If the player played by the same rules as the dealer, the simultaneous bust would be: **0.28 * 0.28 = 7.8%**. But since the player is allowed to stand on 16 or less under certain circumstances, our 'mafia' man calculated that the final odds would be around **5.9%**. That's the 'physical probability' of casino winning at blackjack.

The casino offers bonuses to the player, however. They pay *3 to 2* for a *natural 21* (*Ace+Ten* in the first 2 hands of the player). They also allow *double-down* and *splitting pairs*. At the end of the day, the bj house advantage goes all the way down to that glamorous figure of 0.5%.

Right now, we focus our attention on the raw figure of 5.9%. Based on that figure (and so-called simulations), everybody agreed that the results of blackjack were:

*48%*winning hands for the*dealer**44%*winning hands for the*player**8%*hands end up as*pushes*(*ties*).*44/92 = 47.8%*winning probability for the*player*

In order to calculate the probability precisely, we must generate all the elements (blackjack hands) in lexicographical order. Nobody even knows how many hands are possible, as their size varies widely: From two cards to 10 cards (for one deck)! When two or more decks are employed, the blackjack hands can go from two cards to 11 cards.

Of course, there is a lot of blackjack software out there! But all that software belongs to the *simulation* category. That is, the blackjack hands are dealt randomly. Based on the well-known-by-now * Ion Saliu's Paradox*, random generation does not generate all possible combinations, as some elements repeat. So, we can never calculate the probability precisely based on random generation. If there are 334,490,044 total possible complete hands in blackjack, only 63% will be unique and 37% will be repeats — if we randomly generate 334,490,044 hands.

I had started years ago a blackjack project to generate all possible hands. It was very difficult. I found the project in the year of grace 2009 and also the code to generate sets from a list (last update: 2014). In this case, the list is a 52-line text file with the values of the blackjack cards, from the four 2's to the 16 Tens, to the four Aces. That's a stringent mathematical requirement. The deck of cards must be also ordered lexicographically, if we want to correctly generate all qualified sets in lexicographical order.

I generated blackjack hands as both *combinations* and *arrangements*. Then, I opened the output files (text format) and checked as many hands as possible. Yes, computing things are so much better today than just a decade ago. The generating process is significantly faster.

I wrote a special Web page dedicated to the topic of calculating precisely mathematically the *bust-odds* at blackjack following the *Dealer's rules*. There are lots of details, plus screenshots of the probability programs:

.**Blackjack Dealer Bust: Software to Calculate Probability, Odds, House Edge, Advantage HA**

Keep this new figure in mind: The odds for a blackjack Dealer's bust are * at least 33%*.

**The bust probability is calculated by dividing the number of Dealer's busted hands to the total possible blackjack actions.***is a parameter that counts everything: Busted hands, pat hands (17 to 21), blackjack hands, and draws or hits to the first 2-card hands (*

**Blackjack actions***incomplete hands*). The software does NOT print the

*incomplete bj hands*.

How can we apply the new programming to determine the bust odds for the blackjack Player? After heated debates in forums in 2014, I simply modified my software. The hit-stand limits can be set by the user. Initially, it was fixed — the ubiquitous *hit all 16 and under, stand on all 17 or greater*.

The software user can set the hit-limit to any value. The choices are, obviously, from 12 to 16. I tried, for example, the hit limit to 11 — that is, hit anything 11 or under, stand on anything 12 or higher. Evidently, there is no bust in such situations. That's another proof that my programming is 100% correct.

I believe that setting the __hit limit to 14 or 13__ reflects pretty closely the __bust odds for the Player__. That is, stand on 15 or greater (as arrangements):

Or, stand on 14 or greater (as arrangements):

- Now, the house edge goes between something like .3355 * .2248 = 8.3% and something like .3355 * .1978 = 6.6%. It averages out to
. It is a far cry from the intentionally false house advantage (HA) of .5%, or even .17% (promoted by several crooks)!__7.5%__ - The overwhelming majority of blackjack players lose their bankrolls quickly, because this is NOT a 50-50 game or so much close to that margin.
- And always be mindful that blackjack is strongly sequential: The Dealer always plays the last hand. Otherwise, the casinos would go bankrupt.

Recalculating the raw figures for winning/losing hands, my theory shows:

*50%*winning hands for the*dealer**41%*winning hands for the*player**9%*hands end up as*pushes*(*ties*).*41/91 = 45%*winning probability for the*player*

Axiomatic ones, who's right and who's wrong? If you have been a frequent visitor of my website, you already know how many hits I've been taken from casino executives, agents, moles, other gambling authors, system developers, vendors, gurus, bishops, saints, etc. Granted, the attacks against yours truly were far more intense earlier (beginning 1998 and ending early 2000's). They realized I wouldn't get intimidated, so they have given up, by and large.

In this year of grace 2019, I came up with a new idea: Let's set at the same table mathematics and reality. The first attacks aginst me went along the lines: *'Mathematics, specifically formulae, have no place in gambling — as it is totally random.'* And I've always counterattacked: *'But what is not random, crooked idiots? The entire Universe is ruled by Almighty Randomness, as voided of consciousness as it might be!'*

*Standard deviation* is the watchdog of randomness. Let's see what figures of blackjack odds are right by employing the *binomial standard deviation*. Then, compare the results to casino gambling reality.

It is time now to apply the most important **bonuses** the casinos grant to the blackjack players:

*natural 21*pays*3-to-2**double down*pays*2-to-1*(if successful)*splitting pairs*pays*2-to-1*(if successful).

We ignore the current tendency in the gambling industry to pay a *natural bj 6-to-5*.

The *double down* success is closely around *60%*. The same success rate of *60%* occurs in the *pair splitting situations*.

Next, it is very important to know the probability/odds of appearance for the 3 bonuses above.

*natural 21*occurs in 4.8% of cases, but only when dealing 2 cards to oneself at the beginning of a 52-card deck. We average the odds to**4%**for multiple players (4 players and a bj dealer is an average situation in my book). Refresh your memory by reading this popular resource:.**Calculate Blackjack Probability, Odds:**__Natural 21__, Insurance, Double-Down Hands, Pairs

*double down*hands have an appearance rate of**8%**, as first calculated by yours truly. Please read this very popular resource:.**Calculate Probability of**__Double-Down__Hands

*splitting pairs*hands have an appearance rate of**3%**, as first calculated by yours truly. Please read this very popular resource:.**Calculate Probability of**__Split Pair__Hands

### Odds Of Losing 8 Straight Blackjack Hands

Axiomatics, we run my probability software widely known as **SuperFormula.exe**, the function *D: Standard Deviation*. We run the function twice: First, for the *traditional* black jack parameters (5.9% odds, 48% winning probability for the player); secondly, for what I consider * closer-to-reality blackjack parameters*.

We take a common case of playing 100 hands. That is, the blackjack player must cash in the amount needed to play 100 hands at the minimum bet. For example, in the rare case of $10 minimum bet, the player must chip in at least $1000. I can't stress enough the stupidity of players who start with $100... they lose quickly... then leave the table... go to another table and cash in $100... etc. *Vae victis!* Poor victims!

WHOA! ON AVERAGE, THE PLAYER WINS 52 BET UNITS AFTER PLAYING 100 HANDS!!! That's a flagrant impossibility in 99.7% to all blackjack players, in all casino situations. You and I will never, ever, see a basic strategy player be ahead $52 after playing 100 hands, at $10 table minimum!

We come back to earth by going with my fundamental blackjack parameter: **45%** winning odds for the player.

You, the player, do lose. Still, this is the happiest case calculated by my blackjack-odds software: __One deck of cards__. Today's PCs are still incapable (at least in the case of this programmer) to calculate for two or more decks of cards. But I experimented with calculable amounts of cards. The rule is very clear: The more cards, the worst the odds get for the player. In other words, the more decks, the worse conditions for the blackjack hopeful! And even worse with multiple players at the table (the common reality)!

### Odds Of Blackjack Hands

Haven't you witnessed this in any casino, at any blackjack table? The overwhelmingly vast majority of players lose their bankroll quickly. They leave the venues almost on their knees. *'How the hell is this possible,'* they ask themselves (sometimes loudly). *'Blackjack is supposed to be a 50-50 game... damn it!'*

It ain't such a *golden coin game*, *kokodrilo* (royalty-name for *big-time gambler*)! I'm afraid you were misguided big-time... you still are. You are mostly cheated by the card-counting crooks, the bedfellows of the casinos in that gambling bedlam! You go by their insane odds and you are guaranteed to win as a matter of fact. Play 100 hands and win $52 at $10 minimum bet. Well, then, ask for a $100 table minimum and make a $500 net. This is the **average**, but it will be confirmed in any reasonable *long run*. Not the *billions of hands long-run* prophesized by the crooks!

### Odds Of Losing Blackjack Hands In A Row

__Blackjack: Software, Content, Resources, Systems, Basic Strategy, Card Counting__

See above: The comprehensive directory of the pages and materials on the subject of blackjack, baccarat, software, systems, and basic strategy.:__Blackjack__.**Basic Strategy, Card Counting, Charts, Tables, Probability, Odds, Software**.*The Best Blackjack Basic Strategy: Free Cards, Charts*

All three color-coded charts in one file, in the best decision-making sequence:*Split Pairs*, to*Double Down*, to*Hit or Stand*..**Gambling Mathematics in Blackjack Proves Deception of Card-Counting Systems**.**Probability Software to Analyze Blackjack Streaks: Wins (W+), Losses (L-), Busts, Pushes**.**Best Card Counting Blackjack Systems, Casino Marketing, Gambling Deception, Fraud**.**The Best Blackjack Strategy, System Tested with the Best Blackjack Software**.**Blackjack Insurance Bet Favorable to All Players****Download**.**Software: Casino Gambling, Roulette, Blackjack, Baccarat, Craps****Specific software for blackjack, BJ**

~**BJAQK**and**Blackjack**: Probability and statistical analyses of thousands of blackjack hands from the perspective of a strict blackjack*old basic strategy*(*OBS*) player.

**| Home | Search | New Writings | Odds, Generator | Contents | Forums | Sitemap |**

### Odds Of Losing 4 Blackjack Hands In A Row

Blackjack is a game that may look simple on the outside, but beneath the surface, you’ll find that it’s all about odds and making the correct mathematical decisions. It’s easy to let your intuition take over and base your decisions at the table on that. To be able to play perfectly and master blackjack, it is, however, crucial to understand what the odds are for every scenario you face and only base your decisions on those odds. It’s important to be aware of how the house is getting an edge in the game and what advantages us players have to our disposal, which can be used to lower the house edge.

### Odds Of Winning Blackjack Hands

In the following article, we’ll be covering the basics for the optimal blackjack strategy, known as basic strategy, which makes it possible to lower the house edge a great deal. We’ll take a look at how the house is getting its edge; what our own advantages are; give a few examples on the odds on certain outcomes and show you how basic strategy is applied at the tables. The goal is to create a good understanding of the importance of odds and how the use of basic strategy can help you improve your game when you’re playing for real money.